Thistledew Lake
Itasca County, Minnesota
Today's Fishing Forecast
Fishing looks to be very active with peak fishing times around 4-6 PM. SEE MORE

Share your catch!
We want to see what you've caught on Thistledew Lake.Frequently Asked Questions About Thistledew Lake, MN
- How big is Thistledew Lake?
- How deep is Thistledew Lake?
- What kind of fish can you catch in Thistledew Lake?
- Are there places to stay in the Thistledew Lake area?
- Are there boat launches on Thistledew Lake?
- Are there places to eat and drink near Thistledew Lake?
- What is the average air temp for Thistledew Lake?
- Are there any state parks near Thistledew Lake?
How big is Thistledew Lake?
How deep is Thistledew Lake?
What kind of fish can you catch in Thistledew Lake?
Other fish species in the lake include Blackchin Shiner, Bluntnose Minnow, Brook Stickleback, Golden Shiner, Iowa Darter, Johnny Darter, Mimic Shiner, Spottail Shiner and White Sucker.
Are there places to stay in the Thistledew Lake area?
More Lodging Options
Are there boat launches on Thistledew Lake?
Are there places to eat and drink near Thistledew Lake?
History & Status of the Fishery
Thistledew Lake is a 318-acre lake in northeastern Itasca County located 30 miles north of Nashwauk, MN. A state administered public access is located at the north end of the lake on Thistledew Rd. (County 551) off Highway 65. The access has a cement ramp with parking for four rigs. Thistledew Lake has a maximum depth of 45 ft and 23% of the lake is 15 ft or less. The lake has low fertility. The water is clear to light brown, resulting in visibility to a depth of 23 ft in mid-summer. The depth of water at which oxygen levels limit fish presence was 26 ft in mid-summer. One inlet on the western shore flows from Little Dew Lake while one outlet on the southwest shore flows into Moose Lake. Other area lakes with similar habitat include Bluewater, Bello, Hartley, Loon, and Ruby.
The 2020 survey was the 13th survey of the fish community since 1958. Surveys occur to monitor for changes in species composition, number, length distribution, and growth. Gamefish species that are best suited for the lake are Walleye, Northern Pike, and Black Crappie. No special regulations are present.
The Walleye population had a below average catch rate, an average length distribution, and above average growth. Gill net catches were below average for the lake (1.9/net) and low compared to lakes with similar habitat. The sampled Walleye ranged from 10 to 24 inches and averaged 16 inches. The length distribution was average, as only 41% of Walleye exceeded 15 inches. However, 29% exceeded 20 inches, and Walleye 25 to 27 inches have been sampled in six surveys. Walleye ranged from age 2 to 11. Growth rates were above the statewide average. On average, Walleye took four years to exceed 15 inches. Walleye have been stocked for many years because natural reproduction is limited, particularly in recent decades. Twelve of the 17 Walleye sampled in 2020 were from stocked year classes, which is consistent with previous surveys. The Walleye stocking guidelines recommend discontinuing stocking if it fails to produce a viable fishery supporting a catch rate of 2.0/gill net and perch catches are below 8/gill net. Future of Walleye management will be considered based on these recommendations and data.
The Northern Pike population had a low catch rate, average length distribution, and above average growth. Gill net catches were below average for the lake and low compared to lakes with similar habitat. However, higher catches are undesirable because they are usually associated with higher density populations having poor size structure and slow growth. The sampled pike ranged from 13 to 31 inches and averaged 21 inches. The length distribution was average, as 44% of pike exceeded 21 inches and 6% exceeded 28 inches. However, pike over 30 inches were sampled in six surveys. The largest fish sampled was a 38-inch fish in 2016, indicating the potential exists for producing larger pike. Pike ranged from age 1 to 7. Growth rates exceeded the statewide average. On average, pike took four years to exceed 21 inches. The pike population may interest anglers and spearers due to its length distribution. However, due to the lake's small size, anglers are encouraged to release pike over 26 inches and harvest up to 10 less than 22 inches to help maintain and improve size structure. Spearers are encouraged to harvest smaller pike also. Thistledew Lake is in the North-central Zone for pike management, which may contribute to modest improvements in size quality.
The Black Crappie population had low catch rates and an above average length distribution. Gill net catches were above average for the lake and low compared to lakes with similar habitat. Only two crappie were sampled in 2020, which were 11 and 13 inches. Only twice have the total number of crappie sampled by all gears exceeded eight fish. Ten-inch fish were sampled in eight surveys, while 12-inch fish were sampled in three. Therefore, the potential exists for producing larger crappie. Growth rates from previous surveys were above average. On average, crappie took four years to exceed eight inches. Although the crappie population was lower in 2020, fish over 10 inches that interest anglers have been sampled in 62% of surveys.
The Largemouth Bass population had an average catch rate and length distribution in gill nets. However, only seven bass were sampled with in 2020. The most effective method to evaluate a bass population is spring night electrofishing, which has only occurred in 2016. Electrofishing catches were twice the average for Grand Rapids area lakes. The 97 bass sampled with electrofishing ranged from 3 to 17 inches and averaged 11 inches. The length distribution was average, as 45% of bass exceeded 12 inches and 9% exceeded 15 inches. The largest fish ever sampled was an 18-inch fish in 2016. Bass ranged from age 1 to 9. Growth rates were below the statewide average. On average, bass took six years to exceed 12 inches. Due to the lake's small size, anglers are encouraged to release bass exceeding 15 inches to help maintain or improve size structure.
The Bluegill population has consistently had low to average catch rates, length distributions, and growth. Only 16 Bluegill were sampled in gill nets in 2020. Bluegill populations are evaluated better with spring trap netting. However, surveys on Thistledew Lake have occurred in August. This timing likely results in lower trap net catches. Trap net catches have been lower than those observed on lakes with similar habitat. Length distributions from trap nets indicate the population has below average proportions of fish over 6 and 8 inches. Growth was below the statewide average. On average, Bluegill took six years to exceed six inches. Due to the lake's small size, anglers are encouraged to release Bluegill exceeding 8 inches to help maintain or improve size structure.
The Yellow Perch population had a low catch rate. The gill net catches were the lowest observed (1.1/net) and declined in each of the last three surveys. Declining perch numbers are consistent with statewide trends that have occurred since the 1970s. Reasons for statewide declines include increased predation by gamefish, higher Bluegill numbers resulting in perch having to share food resources, and loss of woody habitat along shorelines due to removal by property owners. Lower perch numbers can limit the number of gamefish the lake can support. The ten perch sampled ranged from 6 to 7 inches. While 8-inch perch were sampled in the first eleven surveys, none were sampled in the last two. Ten-inch perch have not been sampled since 1985. Statewide Walleye stocking guidelines recommend discontinuing stocking if perch gill net catches fall below 8/net.
Other species sampled included Pumpkinseed Sunfish and Rock Bass.
In order to maintain or improve fish and wildlife populations, water quality and habitat must be protected. People often associate water quality problems with large-scale agricultural, forestry, urban development or industrial practices in the watershed. In reality, the impact of land use decisions on one lake lot may be relatively small, yet the cumulative impact of those decisions on many lake lots can result in a significant decline in water quality and habitat. For example, removing shoreline and aquatic vegetation, fertilizing lawns, mowing to the water's edge, installing beach sand blankets, failing septic systems and uncontrolled run-off, all contribute excess nutrients and sediment which degrade water quality and habitat. Understanding these cumulative impacts and taking steps to avoid or minimize them will help to insure our quality fisheries can be enjoyed by future generations.
Anglers and boaters are reminded to help slow the spread of invasive species by removing all aquatic plants from boats, trailers, and equipment. All drain plugs must be removed and live and bait wells must be drained before leaving the access. Anglers and boaters are encouraged to power wash and thoroughly dry all equipment prior to use in another water body.
What is the average air temp for Thistledew Lake?
Are there any state parks near Thistledew Lake?
For more Minnesota State Park information see our State Park Guide.
Thistledew Lake Reviews
Below is the word on street about Thistledew Lake.Have you been to Thistledew Lake? Why not share your personal reveiw with others?
Submit Review
trevor d.

More Nearby Lakes To Explore
There's more lake's to explore around Thistledew Lake...| DISTANCE | ACRES | MAX DEPTH | |
| Little Moose Lake | 0.8 mi | 99 | 20 ft |
| Lily Lake | 1.3 mi | 15 | |
| Little Drew Lake | 1.3 mi | 22 | |
| Mirror Lake | 1.7 mi | 109 | 45 ft |
| Sun Lake | 2.3 mi | 12 | |
| Unnamed Lake | 2.4 mi | 10 | |
| Unnamed Lake | 2.4 mi | 22 | |
| Unnamed Lake | 2.7 mi | 10 | |
| Perch Lake | 2.8 mi | 15 | |
| Unnamed Lake | 3.3 mi | 22 |


(1)
