This woman seems sane and not a fraudster. I lived and hiked there. It is remote even though it's hours from LA
http://abc30.com/society/socal-woman-claims-she-saw-bigfoot;-sues-california-to-prove-it/3095805/
General Discussion
Bigfoot
Displaying 61 to 75 of 1,410 posts
Time to get a wee bit serious with real data on this thread.
FWIW, below is something I posted several years ago. The graph in the middle is from Dr. Henner Fahrenbach of the Oregon Primate Research Center. It shows the relationship of "ball width index" (foot width/length) of sasquatch tracks collected across North America and across multiple decades (ranging in size from youngster to large adult) vs. that of man. Dr. Fahrenbach contended that the sasquatch foot dimensions as indicated by the ball width index (and other track dimensional data from hundreds of different individuals, based on length and geographic collection point) do not match up with humans at all. He, along other well-respected primatologists, mammologists, and anthropologists, have long concluded the existence of this rare, nomadic primate. Many track casts from across NA (taken in softer substrate, like wet sand, silt/loam, or clay-based soil) have dermal ridges on them that don't match any other known primate (each species has its unique pattern). In addition, many track casts show sweat pores, healed cuts, and other injuries. Those details are impossible to fake, especially in a trackway of prints where toe spread and flexion is changing cast to cast with terrain substrate.
Along with the graph, I attached the image of one of the multiple track casts from the 1967 Patterson/Gimlin film and one other purported track cast image. Both of those specimens fall on the data line for sasquatch.
The center track is an actual human print photographed on the Woodlands beach on Plum Lake a few years ago. The width/length ratio of that track falls right on the line for human.
Do with it as you will....
FWIW, below is something I posted several years ago. The graph in the middle is from Dr. Henner Fahrenbach of the Oregon Primate Research Center. It shows the relationship of "ball width index" (foot width/length) of sasquatch tracks collected across North America and across multiple decades (ranging in size from youngster to large adult) vs. that of man. Dr. Fahrenbach contended that the sasquatch foot dimensions as indicated by the ball width index (and other track dimensional data from hundreds of different individuals, based on length and geographic collection point) do not match up with humans at all. He, along other well-respected primatologists, mammologists, and anthropologists, have long concluded the existence of this rare, nomadic primate. Many track casts from across NA (taken in softer substrate, like wet sand, silt/loam, or clay-based soil) have dermal ridges on them that don't match any other known primate (each species has its unique pattern). In addition, many track casts show sweat pores, healed cuts, and other injuries. Those details are impossible to fake, especially in a trackway of prints where toe spread and flexion is changing cast to cast with terrain substrate.
Along with the graph, I attached the image of one of the multiple track casts from the 1967 Patterson/Gimlin film and one other purported track cast image. Both of those specimens fall on the data line for sasquatch.
The center track is an actual human print photographed on the Woodlands beach on Plum Lake a few years ago. The width/length ratio of that track falls right on the line for human.
Do with it as you will....
I just caught up on this thread!
Some awesome research took place on Plum last week!
Hats off gentlemen - well done!
Also Polski, with squatches you don't have to be the fastest runner in the group, you just can't be the slowest!
Some awesome research took place on Plum last week!
Hats off gentlemen - well done!
Also Polski, with squatches you don't have to be the fastest runner in the group, you just can't be the slowest!
I saw a episode from Kenosha county where they were interviewing several hunters about the SQUATCH sightings that they supposedly saw . I noticed that the group of hunters all had rifles but at time Kenosha county was shotgun only! Lol. No credibility but humerous to watch.
It happen Snake. No big deal.
I was very excited for Expedition Bigfoot, Season 4. And it was just complete and utter non-sense.
And they were in a location where I feel like they did not need to manufacture evidence.
BTW....I was around Plum Lake for about 35 years of my life. I spent many nights on the lakes up there. I too heard things. But I never saw anything that I couldn't easily dismiss. Most of the sounds that I heard were exact recordings that I have heard in Bigfoot shows.
One of my friends, though.....had a very eerie encounter just east of Minocqua.
I was very excited for Expedition Bigfoot, Season 4. And it was just complete and utter non-sense.
And they were in a location where I feel like they did not need to manufacture evidence.
BTW....I was around Plum Lake for about 35 years of my life. I spent many nights on the lakes up there. I too heard things. But I never saw anything that I couldn't easily dismiss. Most of the sounds that I heard were exact recordings that I have heard in Bigfoot shows.
One of my friends, though.....had a very eerie encounter just east of Minocqua.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cVi4uYtQh_o I dont know if this helps you Vegas, best I've ever came
across though, be careful out there guys, BMR nice work on Plum, should put together a "how to" video soon, lots
of us on here need direction? Scary Stuff.....
across though, be careful out there guys, BMR nice work on Plum, should put together a "how to" video soon, lots
of us on here need direction? Scary Stuff.....
Okay, Bigfooters.....
I just finished up season 4 of Expedition Bigfoot. It was without a doubt the worst "reality" series that I've watched. Keep in mind, I want to believe....but that show was utterly ridiculous. They had "story writers" and "story producers" attached to the show.
They used technology that just so happened to be there when they found "evidence" and needed some tech. Such as the cave exploration and the robotic "dog". Once there, they "found" a shape on Lydar that didn't appear on camera. Never mind the fact that the tunnel was so small a robotic "dog" could hardly fit, let alone an 8-9 foot Bigfoot.
Their "interviews" with folks telling stories were just the worst ever. One of them couldn't even keep from smiling and laughing as she was recounting her "experience". Evidence wise, they found nothing that I couldn't easily explain away. Especially since I know that there are hunters traveling with the crew as well as producers planting evidence for them to "find".
How much stock do you take in a show like this? I believe the best evidence I've ever seen was the home video of the man who caught something by a river in Utah. He was on a kayak, saw something, filmed it and it stood up then walked up a very steep mountain to get away. That's the evidence that I think is best, not something that has writers and producers attached to it.
I just finished up season 4 of Expedition Bigfoot. It was without a doubt the worst "reality" series that I've watched. Keep in mind, I want to believe....but that show was utterly ridiculous. They had "story writers" and "story producers" attached to the show.
They used technology that just so happened to be there when they found "evidence" and needed some tech. Such as the cave exploration and the robotic "dog". Once there, they "found" a shape on Lydar that didn't appear on camera. Never mind the fact that the tunnel was so small a robotic "dog" could hardly fit, let alone an 8-9 foot Bigfoot.
Their "interviews" with folks telling stories were just the worst ever. One of them couldn't even keep from smiling and laughing as she was recounting her "experience". Evidence wise, they found nothing that I couldn't easily explain away. Especially since I know that there are hunters traveling with the crew as well as producers planting evidence for them to "find".
How much stock do you take in a show like this? I believe the best evidence I've ever seen was the home video of the man who caught something by a river in Utah. He was on a kayak, saw something, filmed it and it stood up then walked up a very steep mountain to get away. That's the evidence that I think is best, not something that has writers and producers attached to it.
Displaying 61 to 75 of 1,410 posts
